Monday 11 July 2011

Why Blame The Minister?

Indian Railways has been hit by two ugly derailments in quick succession. Dozens of people have died and the minister of state for railways is facing the heat. The media, as usual, has sensationalized the news to enhance their TRPs – flashing headlines with meaningless, uncomfortable questions which can have no answer but are sure to keep the audience glued to the TV screens. The opposition has demanded a resignation and also chastised the Prime Minister for… well, just for the heck of it. A little bit of mud-slinging at every possible opportunity would only enhance their chances in the next general election.



Blaming the minister is the easiest thing to do. Sack him, issue statements criticizing him on national television, appoint a new guy and hope for the best. This is the usual course of action in such cases. Some ministers themselves take the responsibility and resign on account of morals and ethics. Lal Bahadur Shastri, for instance, had resigned as the aviation minister after the much talked about plane crash. But will it solve the problem? Has anybody bothered to look at the root cause of the calamity? How can we stop these accidents from happening?

Train derailments happen, as far as I can see, for 4 reasons –

1) Naxals decide that want to kill a few people. So they go and loosen some screws in the railway line.

2) Extremists and terrorists, for reasons best known to them, blow up stuff.

3) Incompetence or carelessness of railways employees – head on collision due to mishandling of the signal, derailment due to drunk drivers etc.

4) Old, worn out railway tracks which are in dire need of replacement.

About the naxals, there’s nothing much that can be done. It’s not possible to man the railway tracks with guards to watch out for unscrupulous people. Terrorism is a global menace which we must all fight together. There is no simple, short term solution. To improve the quality and professionalism of the railway officials, there needs to be a change in the recruitment policy, the compensation package, the training programs and we need better supervision. The worn out sections of the railroad need to be identified and adequate provisions made in the budget to replace them as required.

All these are long term measures. Implementing these will take time. And while the process is on, the media won’t be discussing it coz the news isn’t sensational enough; the ruling party wouldn’t gain any political mileage out of it coz the work isn’t glamorous enough. As a result, these necessary steps might never be taken. In a political set up, where one is judged on a daily basis, the minister is bound to focus on developments which would grab eyeballs. Hence, most railway ministers only talk about introducing new trains, cutting fares etc. – things which would have an immediate impact.

I pass no judgment on the ability or dedication of the MoS railways in the present case. But perhaps, for once, if we stop blaming the minister for everything that goes wrong and give him a free hand to bring about long term improvements, our country might finally see some real progress.

4 comments:

  1. well to an extent i disagree with you: http://www.madurai247.com/2011/06/erode-district-collector-anand-kumar.html

    ReplyDelete
  2. Disagreement is good. :) Heterodoxy which leads to constructive arguments based on sound reasoning is indeed a very good way to learn from each other.

    the article is interesting. it's good to know that high ranking officials are leading by example to promote the govt. schools.

    one doubt - how is this related to my post?

    ReplyDelete
  3. A small correction:
    Lal Bahadur Shastri resigned from Railway minister following a major train accident at Mahabubnagar.

    Though merit of post may lie in your criticism of 'mud slinging' instead of critical appraisal, but some of your arguments are certainly debatable.

    Naxalism has been tackled with and can be tackled with. See the AP model for reference.

    Big reason for these mishaps has been the frequency vs Cooling time of the tracks. And that arises from populist demand vs. restricted availaibility of infrastructure per capita. This pressure has to be dealt with strong political conviction which is invariably different from promotion of state chauvinism.

    Democracy is deeply rooted in the very essence of people's faith and at any point this is threatened, you are deemed accountable, and hence outcry for resignation. Praful Patel was very much responsible for the deplorable state in which Air India thrives or for that matter in the 2G scam, if PMO is indicted, collective responsibility falls on PM.

    Lets not forget that these are tools to maintain the reponsibility of an office bearer so as to make them accountable to you, me and all of us.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yes, I agree. Thank you for bringing up these points. :)

    ReplyDelete